A simple planning tool to explore deployment footprint and sustainment demand for expeditionary camp concepts.
Welcome. If you have arrived here from my LinkedIn network, this tool is a simple thought experiment inspired by the JP8218 Deployable Infrastructure program. It allows you to explore the logistics footprint behind deployable camps — how changes in camp size, environment and duration affect deployment load, sustainment demand and transport requirements. The model is deliberately simplified and indicative, but it provides a useful way to visualise the scale and trade-offs that sit behind expeditionary infrastructure concepts.
Feedback from practitioners is very welcome. The assumptions used in the model are deliberately simplified and should be treated as indicative only.

Start by defining the camp population, duration and environment. Then compare two scenarios to see how the deployment and sustainment burden changes.
A deployable camp can require a surprisingly large logistics train before sustainment even begins. The infrastructure is only part of the story. The more difficult question is often how much movement, fuel, water and support effort the concept imposes once it is deployed.
This model is intentionally simple. It is built for early discussion, not compliance, pricing, or engineering certification.
Transport figures are ISO-equivalent approximations only. Air and sea lift equivalents are broad planning proxies.
Larger camps trigger warehousing and maintenance elements because forward logistics nodes have a different burden to a small temporary camp.
The right use is to test scale and assumptions. The wrong use is to treat the output as a final answer.